Monday, March 3, 2008

Rightwing Rumblings

Showing posts with label Gandhi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gandhi. Show all posts
Monday, December 31, 2007
Gandhi who ??

Below are some talks with a few people I read on a blog: (Magazine - Views & Reviews)

Question: Mahatma Gandhi. We know him by several names. But how many us know about him?

a 10th standard girl from Chennai:

He must have done something right or his birthday wouldn't be a holiday for us every year

another kid from Chennai:

Mahatma Gandhi is the Father of our Nation. I don't know what that means but he was a great man. He was a great man because he was a very smart man. He was always walking with a long stick and told evil people not to fight with each other.

Gandhiji made Independence Day for India. When evil people came to India from England, he told them to go away and not to fight with us. But they broke all the rules. Gandhiji told not to fight but there was lot of fighting. And India was free.

I don't know Gandhiji's full name but he was born in India. A very evil man killed him. It was very long ago so I think he must have killed him with a bow and arrow. I know what Gandhiji looks like because I have seen him on books when I go to Landmark in Citi Centre. I have also seen him in Munnabhai.

more as follows:

Q: What was Gandhiji's full name?
A: (Long pause) Mohandas Gandhi... I think.

Q: How did he die?
A: He was shot.

Q: Who killed him?
A: Hm... don't know.

Q: Where was he born?
A: I used to know this... but no idea

Q: Did he die before Independence or after?
A: I'm going with after.

Q: What was the movement he was known for?
A: Non-violence movement?

Q: Wife's name?
A: Nope.

Q: Did he have children?
A: Yes.

Q: How do you know that?
A: Well, because everyone keeps talking about how Nehru's kid carried on his legacy but Gandhiji's did not.

Q: Watched any movies on Gandhi / about Gandhi?
A: Just the one starring Ben Kingsley a long time ago.

Q: In which city was Mahatma Gandhi born?
A: "Gujarat," says Madhusudhan. "I think the city was Kathiawar,"

Q: What was the date of his assassination?
A: Don't know.

Q: What was the name of his wife?
A: Don't know.

Homemaker, Hyderabad
Q: In which city was Mahatma Gandhi born?
A: Ahmedabad.

Q: What was the date of his assassination?
A: He was killed before India's Independence. I don't know the exact date.

Q: What was the name of his wife?
A: She used to be called Ba.

Sales Executive, Chennai

"Ok he did a lot for us and all but it's not like freedom got us anywhere... We're still a poor country. And was he the one responsible for our freedom anyway? I'm sure others also had something to do with it. So what's the hype about? And those women who were always with him. He was a sex maniac, wasn't he? Someone told me that, though I don't know the details."

Class 12 student, Chennai

"He was cool I guess. Did a lot for our country. Apparently he didn't have sex for some 50 years. Is that true? How come his wife didn't leave him? And how did that help us in getting our freedom? But yeah, he must have done something right or his birthday wouldn't be a holiday for us every year."

College student, Chennai
“Umm.. I don't know much about him. He was a great man I guess. They wouldn't have made him a saint and made so many statues of him otherwise. Sorry, my history sucks."

College student, Chennai
"He was a good guy. He did a lot for India and all that. He's like, he made like some very good policies like truth and non-violence and all. But I guess people don't care much about it, they don't follow his policies. I mean like, people lie all the time. But personally I feel he was a great guy."

Security Guard, Hyderabad
Q: In which city was Mahatma Gandhi born?
A: Don't know. I've seen Shankardada Zindabad (remake of Lage Raho Munnabhai, starring Chiranjeevi) twice, but I didn't pay attention to the details about Gandhiji. What I do know about him was that he preached non-violence.

Q: What was the date of his assassination?
A: Don't know.

Q: What was the name of his wife?
A: Don't know.

house wife from Trivandrum, Kerala

"I was 12 when I first heard about Mahatma Gandhi. Everyone in our locality respected him. Gandhiji's picture used to appear in currencies and coins. So I was sure that he must have done something great for the people of our country. Otherwise, why should people give him so much importance? But I still don't know what he did for us. We used to call him Gandhiappoppan (appoppan means grandfather in Malayalam). I have seen his pictures printed on wall posters during election campaigns. I don't know much about him."

(a westerner living in India)
"I have been living in India for the past 10 years and have a chain of hotels here. I also run the Children of the World India, a Chennai-based charity that gives free education to tsunami affected children.

I had heard about Gandhi even before I came to India as he's the most important figure in this century. I don't know his full name but I know that he was born in Gujarat. I have seen several documentaries on his life, so I know all about his life, his stay in South Africa. Just two weeks ago, I saw a documentary on Gandhi which was on the Internet, Gandhi: Pilgrim of Peace. It showd how there was an attempt on Gandhi's life one week before he was actually assassinated. And the attempt was made by none other than the brother of the man who finally assassinated him. I don't remember his name though. I have also watched Gandhi, My Father, the movie which was released some time ago.

What I remember most about Gandhi is that he stood for non-violence. And he made India independent through non-violent means. He was a very unconventional person as he took a different stance. Though he was against the Partition, he always tried to protect the rights of Muslims."

Okay, now my point: Even after all these hypes and twisted history lessons, people are not aware of Gandhiji, so, can you guys guess what they would be knowing about The Great Dharma, with so much of twisted views on our own heritage?

And looking at the above, we will have to ackowledge that, the last opinion by a European holds the most truth, he is aware of our history and people than the so called "Indians".

This is again concreting my views that unless we have our own education system, our own future lies in peril......
Posted by Karsewak at 2:11 PM 0 comments
Labels: Gandhi
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Ghandu ji - An Hypocrate

1. 'The Mahabharat is mythological', said Gandhi!
Gandhi's picture where he is dressed in a loincloth, with a copy of the Bhagwad Gita at his side - is a common sight throughout India . Gandhi did not accept Sri Krishna as God, but as a man with exceptional qualities.

Gandhi believed that Mahabharata was a work of fiction and that it did not actually take place. He said, 'Pandav's and Kaurav's are in reality the conflict between good and bad tendencies within us. Pandav's are the good tendencies and Kauravs, the bad ones',

In the Eleventh Chapter of Gita, it is said that Lord Krishna shows His formidable form to Arjuna. According to Gandhi this chapter was interpolated, meaning that it was not there in the original Gita and that someone appended it later. The same Gandhi, it is said, discovered 'Yoga of non-attachment' from the same Bhagwad Gita! It is said that he discovered Satyagraha from Gita as well!

'Burn the treatises on Gita, which do not acknowledge Lord Krishna to be the Supreme God.' - Gurudev, Dr. Kaate Swami ji (Ghangarjit, January 2006)

2. Gandhi said, 'Idols of Deities do not have any powers'!
(Mahatma?) Gandhi said, 'the Idols of Deities do not have any powers. It is very dangerous to believe that the idol which is prayed to and worshiped protects the devotee and that it cures him of physical and emotional ailments.'

His words are - 'The belief in the curative powers of idols is dangerous' (Truth Vol. I P, 359) Understand how dangerous is Gandhi himself. We should pity Gandhi.

'It is a shameful for Hindus that Hindu Gandhi was responsible for shattering the faith of Hindus.' - Gurudev Dr. Kaate swami ji (Ghangarjit, May 2005)

3. Gandhi - Destroyer of Hindu traditions!
Gandhi used to say, 'A pure hearted person can explain the true meaning of our Scriptures!' On this premise he destroyed Hindu Traditions. This is Gandhi's explanation!

In his commentary the Dutch missionary Elst writes, 'The theologians versed in Sanskrit grammar and scriptures are not the best guides to interpret the text? What right did Gandhi have in asking Hindus to behave against the Scriptures?

- Gurudev Dr. Kaate swami ji (Ghangarjit, April 2005)

4. Gandhi, Nehru and their Congress - responsible for Atheist Hindus!
It is because of Gandhi, Nehru and their Congress that secularism was fabricated and God and righteousness were thrown out of our Constitution and Governance. The atheist attitude seeped into every sector all over the country.

There was an egoistic propaganda that since Science had to a large extent destroyed our faith in God and religion, therefore Science is God. - Gurudev Dr. Kaate swami ji (Ghangarjit, August 2005)

5. Gandhi opposed Science and the Hindu religion!
"It is a lie that Gandhi brought to the fore Charkha, Khadi and cottage industry to check the process of modernization and so promoted the Hindu culture. The Charkha does not find mention anywhere in ancient literature. It has no place in Sanatan Hindu culture. The Charkha, spinning yarn, and Khadi were meant to support the approach, 'We will spin our Charkha to win our Independence '. This idea was borrowed from the Western writer Tolstoy. Gandhi's promotion of cottage industry etc. was in opposition to Modernization. He brought the Charkha to check Modernization. All this is anti-Hindu. Hindustan was far advanced in Science and Technology over thousands of years. There is no difference between scientific progress and the spirituality of a Hindu.' - Gurudev Dr. Kaate swami ji (Ghangarjit, January 2006)

6. Gandhi read the Koran in a Hindu Temple !
The atrocious oppression of Hindus in Naukhali during the rule of (the then Chief Minister of Bengal ) Surawardy in mid 1946 made our blood boil. And when Gandhi sided with the same Surawardy and addressed him as 'Shahid Saheb' (a martyr) later in his prayer meetings, our shame and anger knew no bounds. When Gandhi went to Delhi he held his prayer meetings in a temple in the sweepers colony. Ignoring the protests of the priest he insisted on reading a passage of the Koran as part of the prayer meeting. It was easy for him to trample upon the feelings of the tolerant Hindus.

I wanted to prove to Gandhi that his approach was wrong and wanted to convince him that if Hindu honour was trampled upon, the Hindus could become intolerant. - Shri. Nathuram Godse

(Ref: Panchavan Kotinche Bali ' ('Slaughter of 55 crores'), Author: Shri. Gopal Godse)

7. Gandhi's efforts to make Hindus learn Urdu instead of Sanskrit / Mother tongue
Gandhi's policy of Muslim appeasement can be easily seen by his love for Urdu. Gandhi took the initiative to "father" a new language called as "Hindustani"(Urdu). First he announced his intentions of spreading "Hindi". Then began his rattle of "Hindi and Hindustani" being one and the same. Everyone then knew that there isn't any such language called "Hindustani". That so called language had neither any grammar nor vocabulary! It was nothing but a local spoken language, a child of Hindi and Urdu. Gandhi urged that Hindustani be the National Language of Hindusthan. Owing to the strange language, verbal perversions like "Badshah Ram", "Begum Seeta" and "Ustad Vasisht" began to get propagated and Gandhi surprisingly encouraged them. Then began Gandhi's encouragement to learn Urdu, as Hindusthani and Urdu were only "slightly" different. Unfortunately for Gandhi and his secularist gang, the Hindu Populace still had strong sentiments for Sanskrit and the Hindi Parishad marked Gandhi's doom as a linguistic politician, wherein he had to resign. Gandhi has destroyed pure Sanskritnist Hindi to a great extent. Most of the media use too many Urdu words in Hindi. It is hard to listen pure Hindi in Bhaarat.

(Authors : Gopal Godse and Balarao Savarkar)

8. Kuraan-E-Shareef read at Function
Acharya Vinobha Bhave, the first Satyaagrahi (unfortunately), read out the Kuraane Shareef at the function organized in Nagpur Chatralaya. This news had been published in the newspaper "Independent".

(N.B Khare's "Dambhsphot" Translated. N B Khare's letter to Gandhi. )

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was in fact a Duratma [evil person] and not a Mahatma [great/holy person].A Mahatma treats everybody equal but he did not. He treated Muslims better and absolutely ignored their evil actions not only in India but all over the world. SO HE WAS NOT A MAHATMA. He poisoned the minds of Hindus and Hindu Temples by slogan of Ishwar Allah Tero naam but this slogan was not adopted by Muslims and their leaders.

Gandhi claimed to have throughly read Bible and Quaran but failed to understand the Christians and Muslim minds and their evil deeds.
A day is fast approaching near when his cremation spot at Rajghat, New Delhi will be uprooted and only then new India , a strong India will rise.
India would have been far better off without Gandhis and Nehrus. They are like Rahu and Ketu and these demons must be destroyed by whatever means possible because they are viruses of worst kind.
Posted by Karsewak at 3:48 PM 0 comments
Labels: Gandhi
Friday, March 30, 2007
Bandit Ji - Gandhu Ji

What pathetic men. Nehru a loser drug addict, smoker, womanizing muslim. Ghandhi a pathetic weak, delusional, malnourished, christian. These idiots are the heros that have been forced upon ignorant Hindus by British and secular media. While a real man like veer savarkar is hated by Hindus. Let me tell you about veer savarkar, he was strong forced to push a mill stone that weighed tons for years by the British on andaman Islands, while they whipped him. He was brave jumped out of a ship in the middle of the sea hundreds of miles away from land and swam to shore so he could fight in the freedom movement.

I doubt Gandhi had the strength to lift his arms overhead, I doubt drug addict smoker nehru could even run in place for 5 seconds, but Savarkar he swam hundreds of mile so he could fight for Hindu religion. Third Savarkar was a true Hindu and started the first pan Hindu temple where he himself trained and installed the lowest casts as priests on purpose so they would not be taken advantage of and his temples were open to all Hindus period, even if you are martian from planet mars or from other galaxy. This is definitely kali yug where the sickest of the vile like Gandhi and Nehru are worshipped and the most honorable, brave, strong and righteous like Savarkar are mocked.


September 1944 Bombay, two cowardly skrony pieces of shit Gandhi talks over Jinnahs overtures for a Pakistan
Posted by Karsewak at 9:37 AM 0 comments
Labels: Gandhi, Gandhi nehru dynasty
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Reasons Why I hate Gandhi

main reasons why we hate gandhi

1. Mishandling Khilafat movement

2. Mishandling Mopla riots where thousands of Hindu women were raped and double number of men were killed.

3. Mishandling Swami Shraddananda's murder by a muslim fanatic. (He called that muslim killer a patriot).

4. Forcibly removing Netaji from his post as congress president.

5. Ushering in socialist (sucker) Nehru instead of Patel for the leadership.

6. Calling Chatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj, Maharana Pratap, Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots.

7. Mishandling the Bhagat Singh case.

8. Calling Sardar Udham Singh, who shot that General O'Dwyer, as an insane person.

9. Mishandling 1946 Noakhali riots where tens of thousands of Hindus were looted raped and killed. Gandhi came immediately on spot to save the muslims from retaliation. He even called Suhrawardy who led these riots as Shaheed.

10. Greatest blunders during partition - always rushing and fasting to save muslims from Hindu retaliation but forgetting to save Hindus when they were first attacked.

11.Thousands of Hindu refugees had come to Delhi after being looted of all their property, raped or watching their beloved ones getting raped, injured or watching thier beloved ones getting killed. RSS evacuated the mosques in Delhi for these refugees to stay. The dirty dog gandhi fasted to make these people come out to the streets to let the muslims back in.

12. Granting 55 crores to Pakistan

13. He Was responsible For Killing For More Than thousand of
hindu in WB In Direct Action Day Called By Muslim League

14. His Policy Destoyed The Hindu Culture In Kashmir and
Alls Parts OF Western india Which IS Know As Pakistan

15. Due To Him The East Bengal Was Lost And Today is Know as

16. There was Need For Khilafat Movement PreIndependce
But He Followed The Suite And United Muslim
and Demand Pakistan

17. He Was Person Who Brought So Called " ScukLuasim " Secularism
in these Country.

18. Todays Most Powerful Person Of these Country is not and Indian
but an Itallian(Christan) who is One The Name Of Congress
On Our head.

19. The Biggest Mistake He Had Not Dilluted The Congress

20. If he had wished, INDIA would have been liberated from British more then 15 years before the indipendance.
Gandhi himself was responsible for partion of INDIA, that is too based on religon where he was very much secular.

21.Ignoring Revolutionaries and condemning their violence....and not accepting them as matyrs to the nation

22.Not making Vallabhai Patel the PM instead of Nehru
Posted by Karsewak at 1:02 PM 4 comments
Labels: Gandhi
Monday, January 29, 2007
Is Gandhi really our "Rashtrapita"

Is Gandhi really our "Rashtrapita" ?

Series of articles that will reveal how Gandhi's lust for Muslim leadership
exceeded any of his other priorities. Throughout this article we have mentioned
Gandhi as merely Gandhi and not Mahatma Gandhi as we strongly believe he was
unfit for the title.

Gandhi's efforts to make Hindus learn Urdu instead of Sanskrit / Mother tongue:

Gandhi's policy of Muslim appeasement can be easily seen by his love for Urdu.
Gandhi took the initiative to "father" a new language called as
"Hindusthani"(urdu). First he announced his intentions of spreading "Hindi".
Then began his rattle of "Hindi and Hindusthani" being one and the same.
Everyone then knew that there isn't any such language called "Hindusthani". That so called language had neither any grammar nor vocabulary ! It was nothing but alocal spoken language, a child of Hindi and Urdu. Gandhi urged that Hindusthanibe the National Language of Hindusthan. Owing to the strange language, verbal perversions like "Badshah Ram", "Begum Seeta" and "Ustad Vasisht" began to get propagated and Gandhi surprisingly encouraged them. Then began Gandhi's

encouragement to learn Urdu, as Hindusthani and Urdu were only “slightly”
different. Unfortunately for Gandhi and his secularist gang, the Hindu Populace
still had strong sentiments for Sanskrut and the Hindi Parishad marked Gandhi's
doom as a linguisitic politician, wherein he had to resign.

(Authors : Gopal Godse and Balarao Savarkar)

Kuraan-E-Shareef read at Function: Acharya Vinobha Bhave, the first
Satyaagrahi(unfortunately), read out the KuraaneShareef at the function
organized in Nagpur Chatralaya. This news had been published in the newspaper

(N.B Khare's "Dambhsphot" Translated. N B Khare's letter to Gandhi. )

Ban on ShivBaavani :
ShivBaavani is a small inspiring poem written by poet Bhushan composed of 52 stanzas on Shivaji Maharaj. In the poem, the poet has written that if Shivaji hadn't been born, entire Bharat would have beenconverted to Islam. "Kashiji ki Kala Jaati | Mathura masheed hoti | Shivaji na hotey to Sunnat hoti Sabki |" are the words the poet has used and they correctly depict the fierce fundamentalism and intolerance preached within Islam. Gandhi imposed a ban on this poem to keep the sentiments of our "Muslim Brothers".

(Ref: "sacrifice of 55 crores" by Gopal Godse)

Stopping the singing of Vande Mataram for appeasing Muslims

Gandhi was never interested in the sentiments or feelings of Hindus. He was only interested in becoming the accepted "leader" of Muslims. In his extreme lust forMuslim leadership, he hurt the sentiments of Hindus several times, repeatedly and trampled them over and over again. A few Muslims hated this song and for them, Gandhi immediately took the policy of stopping the Vande Mataram Song.

This song had proved an inspiration for the youth in those days. Bengali
community almost worshipped the song, yet Gandhi cared more for the Muslims thanfor Bengalis or Nation's youth ! Just because a handful of Muslims objected,disregarding the Nationalist sentiments in the song, Gandhi forcibly pushed down his morsel of stopping Vande Mataram down the throats of National Congress. His beliefs of Hindu Muslim unity meant, surrender, boot-licking and donating whatever was asked for, even if it meant that the remaining non-muslim population had to bear consequences!

(Ref : "sacrifice of 55 crores" by Gopal Godse)

Dishonoring the National Flag and National Song for Muslim appeasement

Barrister Jinna, the president of Muslim League demanded a ban on "Vande
Mataram" in 1938. Gandhi had written in Harijan that he wouldn't like any
arguments between Hindus and Muslims regarding Vande Mataram. Gandhi who had been using Vande Mataram in all his letters and speeches himself abandoned VandeMataram and forced the whole Nation to abandon Vande Mataram. The Indian National Congress committee in 1940 announced a decision that the words "VandeMataram" and "Bhagva Tiranga" should not be used by congress members thereafter in any public speeches/ announcements. The two words, which had the potential to ignite a spontaneous wave of patriotism among the Bengalis and prevented the splitting of Bengal, were banned by congress.

("Vande Mataram : Itihas va Katha" by Shri Amarendra Gadgil)

"Aurangzeb and Shivaji will form a Hindi Rashtra !" - Gandhi (Mahatma ?)

From 1920 onwards, Gandhi began a new stunt. He began preaching, "Aurangzeb was
a resident of our Nation for many years. He mustn't be hated, instead Aurangzeb
and Shivaji can together form a Hindi Rashtra".
Posted by Karsewak at 2:50 PM 0 comments
Labels: Gandhi
Saturday, December 16, 2006
Destruction of Gandhigiri is need of the hour

Destruction of Congress and removal of Nehruisn and Ghandism essential for removing slavish mentality of Hindus

The destruction of Congress Party of India is essential in order to eradicate Gandhian mentality in India. Further to this destruction of Rajghat, the removal of Gandhi statue must be at the top of agenda to remove the black spot from the map of TUNCATED PARTIONED INDIA.
1. Gandhians are the "Ugliest of Things". According to John Stuart Mill esteemed British Philosopher the cowardice epidemic within the "Gandhian Mentality" is by far the "Ugliest of Things." Mill states: "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth a war, is much worse . . . A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself." (Dissertations and Discussions 1876)
2. Mill follows in the footsteps of Krishna who stated similar words 5000 years earlier in the Gita to Arjuna.
3. Clearly Gandhians are not Hindus but a new sect based upon cowardice, masochism, and dhimmitude. In some places or some Hindu communities 99% of people claiming to be Hindus are in truth Gandhians the "Ugliest of Things". They have zero patriotism for the India or Hindus because they will never fight. There is not even one Gandhian in the American military. They deplore even the thought of the military.
4. Gandhians should be chastised for being a cancer that is eating India from within, in concert with the Muslims and Christians devouring India from without.

5. Gandhians are not Hindus but rather the "Ugliest of Things" the same goes for the secularists and Congress party.
6. Removal of the Gandhi statues in India will signal that the cancerous "Gandhian mentality" is being eradicated at long last. The outer symbol and the inner mind set are intertwined. The "Gandhian mentality" cannot be eliminated without destroying the statues
Posted by Karsewak at 1:17 AM 0 comments
Labels: Gandhi
Saturday, December 2, 2006
Why Godse Killed Gandhi ?

Nathuram Godse was arrested moments after shooting Gandhi, and was taken to the nearby Tughlaq Road police station. A reporter who managed to see him briefly in a cell at the police station asked him whether he had anything to say. “For the present I only want to say that I am not at all sorry for what I have done”, he replied. “The rest I will explain in court.”

Preliminary investigations revealed that he was the Editor of a Marathi newspaper - Hindu Rashtra and a well-known member of the Hindu Mahasabha.
Clean-cut, sober, intelligent, the thirty-seven-year-old bachelor hardly seemed a candidate for the role of assassin. From time to time he had written scathing editorials denouncing Gandhi and the Congress party, though acquaintances could not recall an occasion when he had spoken bitterly against the Mahatma. He had no personal hatred of Gandhi. Godse even stated in his trial, “Before I fired the shots, I actually wished him well and bowed to him in reverence.”

On 8 November 1948, he was allowed his day in the sun when he rose to make his statement. Reading quietly from a typed manuscript, he sought to explain why he had killed Gandhi. His thesis covered ninety-pages, and he was on his feet for five hours. Godse's statement should be quoted extensively, for it provides an insight into his personality.

"Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus are of equal status as to rights, social and religious, and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Vaishyas, Kshatriyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely what Veer (brave) Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other factor has done.

All this thinking and reading led me to believe that it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (three hundred million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and well-being of all India, one fifth of the human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghatanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the National Independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well. Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokmanya Tilak, Gandhi's influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme.

His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence, which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to these slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a dream if you imagine the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one's own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust.

I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. (In the Ramayana) Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. (In the Mahabharata) Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed the total ignorance of the springs of human action. In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essential for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history's towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhi has merely exposed as self-conceit.

He was, paradoxical, as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them. The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good work in South Africa to uphold the rights and well being of the Indian community there.

But when he finally returned to India, he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on in his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the Civil Disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin it and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma's infallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula for his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.

Thus the Mahatma became the judge and the jury in his own case. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his policies were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with, as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility, Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, and disaster after disaster. Gandhi's pro-Muslim policy is blatantly illustrated in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language.

In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language in India called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, not written. It is a tongue and a crossbreed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma's sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and the purity of the Hindi language were to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with little retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League member’s right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them.

Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and was succeeded by Lord Mountbaten. King Stork followed King Log. The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and secularism, secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian Territory became foreign land to us from 15 August 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in the Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had.

The official date for the handing over of power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what the Congress party calls 'freedom' and 'peaceful transfer of power'. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called it 'freedom won by them with sacrifice' - whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country - which we considered a deity of worship - my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed some conditions on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any conditions on the Muslims.

He was fully aware from past experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi. Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he has failed in his paternal duty inasmuch he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power, his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled against Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless.

Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw that I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I thought that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be practical, able to retaliate and would be powerful with the armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me or dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason, which I consider necessary for sound nation-building.

After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage on both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds in Birla House. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy, which was unfairly favorable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.

I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preaching and deeds are at times at variance with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi's persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism leveled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof someday in future."


From: Dr S Sharma

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi has been called Mahatma Gandhi but he should be called Duratma [evil] Gandhi. He always treated Hindus badly and worked for Muslims and in the end completely surrendered the best of Hindustan to
Muslims and worst was to keep Muslims in the country. The Congress Party of India continued his policy of appeasement of Muslims and today as a result we have Muslim terrorists everywhere in the country who can strike
anywhere, any time at will to harm Hindus and Hindustan.

Now the time is right not only to destroy the statues of Duratma Gandhi but also J.L.Nehru's statues with him. The RajGhat and Shanti Ghat where Gandhi and Nehru's ashes are kept must be destroyed and in place of them
Shivajee, Maharana Pratap statues must be installed.
Further to this oil paintings of Gandhi and Nehru must be removed from Central hall of Parliament in New Delhi.
Teen Murti Bhawan was an official residence of Prime Minister since 1947 but after Nehru's death in 1965 this has become a museum in the memory of Nehru so this must be uprooted. Since 1947 according to statistics 90 percent of public places have been named after Nehru dynasty so this must be changed. In order to do this you must remove white European Catholic Fundamentalist Antonio Maino Gandhi Khan from the power.


Many of the people on who oppose the removal of Gandhi statues are terribly irresponsible. People who do understand that right at this moment Muslims are committing terrible atrocities against Hindus and it will take deadly force to stop it, must understand about the contribution of Gandhi in making Hindus impotent with his philosophy. The Gandhians are in denial that the military is an essential and necessary element of life. They deny the military because the Gandhi mentality believes that spiritual force will solve the problem. Gandhians want to kiss the feet of Muslims as their solution. Rajaram rightly labels Gandhians (the Gandhi mentality) as dhimmis. Gandhians are proof that cowards always remain cowards.

The comments made by the Gandhians are prima facie evidence of the mental imbalance of Gandhians. These comments prove their delusional mindset. These comments prove all of my accusations regarding Ghandians.



Right from Indra Priyadarshini to Priyanka's siblings, the Nehru family has been fooling the people with the 'Gandhi' suffix for more than five decades. Even the foreign-born Sonia has right royally usurped the 'Gandhi' title. But, what is the connection between the title "Gandhi" and the Nehru family?

How many times the media & the columnists have written about this cheating & fraud committed by Nehru family on the innocence of the people of this country?
Posted by Karsewak at 1:30 AM 0 comments
Labels: Gandhi
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Translate Blog

Babel Fish Translation
Dummies Guide to Google Blogger Beta
Blog Archive

* ▼ 2008 (12)
o ▼ March (1)
+ Telangana State Need of The Hour
o ► February (3)
+ Rahul Gandhi a College drop out just like his fath...
+ A Woman
+ New Flag For Hindu Defense
o ► January (8)
+ I'am Sanatan - I'am Eternal
+ DNA of Nehru Dynasty
+ A Good Muslim Is A Dead Muslim
+ Hindutva Philosophy
+ Islamic Time Table
+ Christmas - A Fat Lie
+ Ancient History of NorthEast India during Mahabhar...
+ Think It Over

* ► 2007 (34)
o ► December (2)
+ Gandhi who ??
+ Religion of Peace
o ► October (3)
+ Ghandu ji - An Hypocrate
+ Can a good Muslim be a good world citizen?
+ Behind the Facade of Priyanka Gandhi
o ► September (1)
+ Modern- Hindu War cries
o ► August (1)
+ Conversion an act of aggression against Hindus
o ► June (3)
+ Why Do They Hate My Religion?
+ Soldiers of Hindutva
+ Secularism
o ► May (1)
+ Poisonous Cults
o ► April (2)
+ True Picture of Missionaries!
+ Communism and Feminazism have several features in ...
o ► March (8)
+ Bandit Ji - Gandhu Ji
+ Did You Know ?
+ Bhima's son Gadhotkach-like skeleton found
+ M F Hussain
+ 15 Benefits of the Holy Basil (Tulsi)
+ Indira Khan's (AKA Gandhi) Islamic Roots
+ More on the Nehru Dynasty
+ Nehrus: Where Did They Come From?
o ► February (10)
+ Reasons Why I hate Gandhi
+ Himsa for upholding of Dharma is Ahimsa
+ Never choose God over Motherland !!!
+ Convert Hindu & Sikh Gulz to Islam by all possible...
+ Untold stories of Motilal & Jawahar Lal Nehru
+ Why shud we respect Islam ???
+ 15 August 1947, Morning News, Calcutta
+ Bandit ji Nehru Family Tree
+ Like Mom ,Rahul Gandhi was KGB agent !
+ The Hindu Newspaper May Be Owned By A Muslim In Br...
o ► January (3)
+ Is Gandhi really our "Rashtrapita"
+ FAQ on Hindu Dharma !!!
+ Rahul Gandu & his GF making money in Bharath

* ► 2006 (16)
o ► December (11)
+ Rahul Gandhi is Mentally Slow /Retarded
+ Destruction of Gandhigiri is need of the hour
+ Why not we start our own TV channel ?
+ Sunitha Williams carry Ganesha, Bhagwad Gita into ...
o ► November (5)



* Gandhi nehru dynasty (11)
* hinduism (9)
* islam (8)
* Gandhi (7)
* Hindutva (6)
* christianity (5)
* humour (5)
* conversion (4)
* nehrus (4)
* rahul gandhi (4)
* sonia (3)
* Sanathan Dharma (2)
* do u know (2)
* hindu science (2)
* media (2)
* priyanka gandhi (2)
* FAQ (1)
* M F Hussain (1)
* Mahabharat (1)
* Miss Islam (1)
* Traitors of Hinduism (1)
* communists (1)
* congress (1)
* gay (1)
* minorities (1)
* quran (1)
* video (1)

My links

* pseudo secularism
* India cause
* voice of India
* terrible mughals
* science in vedas
* hindu history

Video Bar
powered by
hinduism, vhp ,sangh,hindutva,Hindu culture - fresh news by

* Religion in Australia
* Religion in Côte d'Ivoire
* Balinese Hinduism and Indonesia's Mixed Identity
* Thaipusam festival: Body piercing equals devotion and thanksgiving
* Kandhamal Violence - Report by 'Justice on Trial'

i'm done watching this

No comments: